Vatican document on integral ecology: Safeguarding Creation is everyoneâs responsibility
By Isabella Piro
The Vatican released a document on Thursday that offers a guide to Catholics, and all Christians, regarding our relationship with Godâs Creation.
Entitled Journeying Towards Care for Our Common Home: five years after Laudato Si, the document coincides with the fifth anniversary of ĐÓMAP”Œșœ Francisâs Encyclical Laudato Sí, which was signed on 24 May 2015 and published on 18 June of that same year.
The document was drafted by the âHoly See Interdicastery Table on Integral Ecologyâ, created in 2015 to evaluate ways to best promote and implement integral ecology.
Institutions linked to the Holy See, along with several Bishopsâ Conferences, and Catholic organizations, make up the committee.
The text was written prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, but it highlights the main message of Laudato Sí: Everything is connected; each particular crisis forms part of a single, complex socio-environmental crisis that requires a true ecological conversion.
First Part: Education and ecological conversion
The first part of the document opens with a reminder of the need for ecological conversion.
This involves a change in mentality leading us to care for life and Creation, dialogue with others, and an awareness of the deep connection between the worldâs problems.
Initiatives such as the âSeason of Creationâ, it says, should be enhanced, along with monastic traditions that teach contemplation, prayer, work, and service. These initiatives can help educate people about the link between personal, social, and environmental balance.
Protecting life and promoting the family
The document then reaffirms the centrality of life and the human person, because ânature cannot be defended without the defence of every human life.â From this fact derives the need to develop the concept of âsin against human lifeâ among younger generations, which can help contrast the âthrowaway cultureâ with a âcaring cultureâ.
The text also places strong emphasis on the family as a âprotagonist of integral ecologyâ. When grounded in the basic principles of âcommunion and fruitfulnessâ, the family can become âa privileged place for education where one learns to respect human beings and Creationâ. States, therefore, are urged to âpromote smart policies for family developmentâ.
Centrality of schools and universities
At the same time, schools are invited to acquire âa new centralityâ, in other words, to become a place to develop the capacity for discernment, critical thinking, and responsible action. The document offers two suggestions in this regard: (1) to facilitate links between the home, the school, and the parish; and (2) to launch training projects for âecological citizenshipâ, which should promote among young people âa new model of relationshipsâ that goes beyond individualism in favor of solidarity, responsibility, and care.
Universities are invited to centre their curricula on a backbone of integral ecology. Through their three-fold mission of teaching, research, and service to society, universities need to encourage students to engage in âprofessions that facilitate positive environmental changeâ. The document suggests specifically that students should âstudy the theology of Creation, which consists in the relationship of the human being with the worldâ, while remaining conscious of the fact that caring for Creation requires âongoing educationâ and a true âeducational pactâ between all institutions involved in education.
Ecumenical and interreligious dialogue
The document also reaffirms that âthe commitment to caring for our common home is an integral part of Christian lifeâ, and not a secondary option. Further, care for our common home is âan excellent areaâ to build ecumenical and interreligious dialogue and collaboration. The âwisdomâ found in various religions, it says, can encourage a âcontemplative and soberâ lifestyle that leads to âovercoming the deterioration of the Planet.â
Ecology of the media
The first part of the document concludes with a chapter dedicated to communication and its âprofound analogyâ with the care of our common home. Both, in fact, are based on âcommunion, relationship, and connectionâ.
In the context of an âecology of the mediaâ, the media are urged to highlight the links between âhuman destiny and the natural environmentâ, while empowering citizens, and combating âfake newsâ.
Second part: Integral ecology and integral human development
The second part of the document opens with the subject of food, referring to ĐÓMAP”Œșœ Francisâ words: âwhenever food is thrown out it is as if it were stolen from the table of the poorâ (LS, 50). Food waste, therefore, is condemned as an act of injustice.
The document calls for the promotion of âdiversified and sustainableâ agriculture, defence of small producers and natural resources, and the urgent need for healthy food education, both in quantity and in quality. There is also a strong call to combat phenomena such as land grabbing and major agro-industrial projects that pollute the environment, as well as an appeal to protect biodiversity.
Echoes of this appeal can also be found in the chapter devoted to water, access to which is âan essential human rightâ. Here, too, there is a call to avoid waste and to go beyond the utilitarian criteria that lead to the privatization of this natural good.
Investing in renewable energy
Along the same lines is an invitation to reduce pollution, to de-carbonize the energy and economic sectors, and to invest in âclean and renewableâ energy, making it accessible to all.
The seas and oceans also cut to the heart of integral ecology. They are the âblue lungs of the planetâ, and require governance focused on the common good of the entire human family and founded on the principle of subsidiarity.
The document also stresses the urgent need to promote a âcircular economyâ that does not aim at over-exploitation of productive resources, but at their long-term maintenance, so that they can be reused. We must overcome the concept of ârejected wasteâ, it says, because everything has value. This, however, will only be possible through positive interaction between technological innovation, investment in sustainable infrastructure, and growth in resource productivity.
The private sector is called upon to operate transparently in the supply chain. The document goes on to call for the reform of fossil fuel subsidies and the taxation of CO2 emissions.
Socio-economic development
In the field of labour, the document expresses hopes for the promotion of sustainable socio-economic development, so that poverty might be eradicated and the marginalized might find paths toward socio-professional advancement. It also calls for decent work, fair wages, efforts to combat child labour, and an inclusive economy which promotes the value of the family and motherhood, along with the prevention and eradication of ânew forms of slaveryâ, such as human trafficking.
The document says the world of finance needs to play its part, by aiming for the âprimacy of the common goodâ and working to put an end to poverty. âThe Covid-19 pandemicâ, reads the document, âshows how elements of the system are being questioned, when it reduces welfare, allows speculation even in misfortune, and oppresses the poorest peopleâ.
The document urges government to close tax havens, sanction financial institutions involved in illegal operations, and bridge the gap between those who have access to credit and those who do not. It exhorts everyone to promote âa style of management of the Churchâs goods that is inspired by transparency, coherence, and courageâ, based on a perspective of integral sustainability.
Civil society, fight against corruption, right to healthcare
Within civil institutions, the document stresses the âprimacy of civil societyâ, which politics, governments, and administrations must serve. It calls for the globalization of substantive, social, and participatory democracy, and a long-term vision based on justice, morality, and the fight against corruption.
The document says an important aspect is the promotion of access to justice for all, including the poor, the marginalized, the excluded. It also encourages governments to ârethink prudentlyâ the prison system, in order to promote the rehabilitation of prisoners, especially young people serving time for their first conviction.
The text then dwells on healthcare systems, calling it âa question of equity and social justice.â It reaffirms the importance of the right to care. âAs ecological networks are degradedâ, it reads, âsocial networks are also broken down. In both cases, it is the poorest who suffer the consequencesâ. The document offers concrete suggestions, including an examination of the dangers associated with âthe rapid spread of viral and bacterial epidemicsâ, and the promotion of palliative care.
Importance of climate question
Finally, the interdicasterial document examines the issue of climate change, saying it has âa profound environmental, ethical, economic, political, and social ârelevanceââ which âimpacts the poor above all.â Therefore, we first need âa new model of developmentâ that links the fight against climate change to the fight against poverty, âin tune with the Social Doctrine of the Churchâ.
Recalling that âno one acts aloneâ, the document calls for a commitment to âlow carbonâ sustainable development to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Proposals made in this area include the reforestation of areas such as the Amazon rainforest, along with support for the international process aimed at defining the category of âclimate refugeeâ to ensure them ânecessary legal and humanitarian protectionsâ.
Efforts made by Vatican City State
The last chapter of the text is dedicated to the commitment of Vatican City State.
There are four operational areas in which the implications of Laudato Sí are applied are: (1) environmental protection (e.g. sorted waste collection already established in all Vatican offices); (2) protection of water resources (e.g. closed circuits for fountain water); (3) care for green areas (e.g. progressive reduction of harmful phytosanitary products); (4) reduced consumption of energy resources (e.g. in 2008, a photovoltaic system was installed on the roof of the Nervi Hall, and new energy-saving lighting systems were installed in the Sistine Chapel, St. Peterâs Square, and the Vatican Basilica, reducing costs by 60, 70, and 80 percent, respectively).
Thank you for reading our article. You can keep up-to-date by subscribing to our daily newsletter. Just click here